Comments on: Jordan’s Son & Nike Equal $3-Million Deal Buster

By: JZD

JZD — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:36:45 +0000

Kobe would break Jordans ankles anyday jordan played when there were not to many talented players like there are today, young, strong, fast and can jump todays players far more superior then when Jordan was playing. There were a hand full back then but not like it is today

By: JZD

JZD — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:31:44 +0000

typical Jordan attitude dropped his but from the team what example is he setting for his team mates

By: Mike

Mike — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:31:04 +0000

WOW universities get the right to exploit students talent and get to tell them what shoes they can wear? I am proud of Jordan wear the shoes you want. I think Nike should step up and offer more for all the free publicity he is giving them. I dont think it is arrogant to want to wear shoes that have your own fathers name on them. People need to relax

By: louie

louie — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:57:24 +0000

it’s only a name.the kid should have gone to a school that had Nike contract.is he a kid with skills?more pressure for the kid to endure.he will never be good enought
he should had got into baseball,where his dad was not very good at

By: Bello

Bello — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:07:23 +0000

wow…..so i cant wear my dads shoes “without the logo” on the court?????? I think adidas needs to grow up, over one players shoes they cancel there agreement….thats pathetic.

By: pete

pete — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:52:33 +0000

Hey! T. Punch
lets look at this, like it really is.
The young man knew about the shoes, he refused to wear them, this is not his first year playing, so please choose your words carefully, there are’nt any morons here the “Young Man” knew what he was doing period. Again the “Young Man” not kid or child knew what he was doing.
So he should be benched, and Daddy should fork over the $3-million….NOW THAT’S AN EXPENSIVE PAIR OF SHOES FOR YOUR ASS…HIS GAME SHOULD BE ON POINT.

By: T. Punch

T. Punch — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:45:54 +0000

If there was a deal in place then the coaching staff should not have allowed Marcus to play in the rival brands product. The Jordan family understands this better than many of those who comment and write news articles about such things. The responsibilty falls on UFC for loosing the deal for any reason what so ever. Marcus is a kid and could have not been allowed to play if he was not wearing the proper uniform. Lets not be a society of morons who now blame our kids for our screw ups. Marcus Jordan (regardless of who his father is) is not at fault for actions of Addidas or the UCF staff.

By: T. Punch

T. Punch — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:39:58 +0000

If their was a deal in place then the coaching staff should not have allowed Marcus to play in the rival brands product. the Jordan family understands this better than many of the idiots who comment and write news articles about such things. The responsibilty falls on the coaching staff. Marcus is a kid and is not at fault for actions of Addidas or the UCF staff.

By: andrew knight

andrew knight — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:53:11 +0000

Again the arrogance of Jordan comes through loud and clear rules are for everyone else

By: lilkunta

lilkunta — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:44:17 +0000

UCF shoould bench Marcus until his Dad pays the school the $3mill they lost from addidas.